K J Smith Solicitors

Sir James Munby states that a Sexual Relationship is not required for a Marriage to be Valid

Published: 26 March 2018

When granting a parental order to a couple where one of the partners is gay, Sir James Munby said that a sexual relationship is not a requirement for a valid marriage in relation to parental orders in surrogacy cases. The case was based on requirements for a parental order under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, with Munby passing a swift judgement outlining the requirements for what is considered a valid marriage.

The Laws within the Case

Under Section 54 of the act, it states that applicants for the order must be husband and wife, which is the case in this particular scenario. The applicants are married, despite one of the parties being gay, and both having always been fully aware of this, meaning that they do meet the criteria set in section 54.

Their marriage did indeed comply with the criteria of the Marriage Act 1949, and Sir James Munby said: ‘There can be no question of the marriage being a sham. In short, the marriage is a marriage. The fact that it is platonic, and without a sexual component, is, as a matter of long-established law, neither here nor there and in truth no concern of the judges or of the state [...] A sexual relationship is not necessary for there to be a valid marriage.’

Under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, it is required that the child in question must be living with the applicants at the time that they make the application for the order and when the order is made. In this case the applicants do live in different homes; however, the child is split between the two applicants and their homes meaning that the child is living with the applicants.

The Case Ruling

As a result, a ruling was made that the parental order would be granted. Although the ruling and statements may appear to be a little surprising to members of the public, it is indeed a fact that sexual relations are not a necessity for a marriage. With this in mind, many will consider the ruling to be a strong, sensible direction for the courts to take in relation to the surrogacy arrangement, and to be what is best for the child, who has two loving homes supporting her.

If you or your partner are in dispute about any child welfare or residency issue then K J Smith Solicitors can help. Our team of family law specialists have many years of experience in dealing with all matters relating to children with care and sensitivity.

For more information or to arrange a free 45-minute consultation, please contact K J Smith Solicitors today on 01491 630000 (Henley on Thames), 020 7070 0330 (London), 0118 418 1000 (Reading), 01753 325000 (Windsor), 01256 584000 (Basingstoke01483 370100 (Guildford), 01494 629000 (Beaconsfield) or 01235 375500 (Abingdon).


Back to News / Blogs

Our Locations

K J Smith Solicitors - Abingdon Office Suite 6, First Floor,
Merchant House,
5 East St. Helen Street,
Abingdon, OX14 5EG
T: 01235 375500
K J Smith Solicitors - Basingstoke Office First Floor,
26 London Street,
RG21 7PG
T: 01256 584000
K J Smith Solicitors - Beaconsfield Office Cross Keys,
18 Wycombe End,
T: 01494 629000
K J Smith Solicitors - Guildford Office Parallel House,
32 London Road,
T: 01483 370100
K J Smith Solicitors - Henley-on-Thames Office 33-35 Station Road,
T: 01491 630000
K J Smith Solicitors - London Office Second Floor,
218 The Strand,
T: 020 7070 0330
K J Smith Solicitors - Reading Office 5-7 Headley Road,
T: 0118 418 1000
K J Smith Solicitors - Windsor Office Castle Hill House,
12 Castle Hill,
T: 01753 325000